
© 2025 Don Pinson | [Download]
(Link not working? Right-click and select “Save As”.)
Huge is the debate about how mankind came into being!
Right here in Kentucky, a magnificent Creation Museum opened in 2007. Ken Ham, a science teacher in Australia was greatly disturbed by the constant statements in classrooms that evolution was how we got on this earth. His research had shown that there was no scientific evidence to support evolution and he was burdened that so few were speaking out against it. So he began showing the scientific evidence, which supported the Biblical account of creation in the book of Genesis. This would lead to a ministry called Answers in Genesis which has become a worldwide organization that tells the true story of man’s origins. That ministry built the Creation Museum. Not far away, they also built an exact replica of Noah’s Ark; with the aim of showing the scientific evidence that there was a worldwide flood, just like the Bible says.
Is there scientific evidence that the Biblical account of creation is more reliable than the theory of evolution? Consider this: Evolution says Continue reading

Does that not make you feel a great responsibility? It certainly should!



“…the LORD shall judge His people…”
For starters, it is not logical: Not in origin, not in practice. No matter what kind of surgery you have on the body, you cannot change the genes. We are internally what God made us to be, either a male or a female. This cannot be changed. Change on the outside does not change what is inside, in the genes or internal organs. Neither can we change the way we go about doing things. All established order in this earth recognizes a male “approach” to things and a female “approach” to things. Thus, you can be a “transvestite” (meaning you can dress like the opposite sex) but you cannot be “transgendered”.
You must be logged in to post a comment.